Saturday, December 29, 2007

From Christmas Past

Charles Dickens wrote a “Christmas Carol” a century or two ago; a story that is told, and retold, on television every year around this time. Watching Scrooge and the Ghost of Christmas Past traipse through the portals of time got me to thinking about Christmas back in the early fifties, when I was still a kid. Yes, it was a long time ago; I’ve celebrated Christmas in each of the last seven decades.

Maybe it’s just that, as someone once said: "There's nothing sadder in this world than to awake Christmas morning and not be a child." Or, maybe I’m just turning into a sentimental old fool but I think Christmas has changed a lot since then.

Except for my youth, and the good health which accompanied it, I’m not really nostalgic for anything about the fifties. I don’t miss the outhouse, for example, especially in the middle of winter where shaking it more than once caused the formation of icicles making it difficult to stuff “the wee thing” back into your britches. And, I don’t miss crowding around the coal stove in the living room with “the old man” yelling from his big chair by the door to “Sit back and let the heat get out.”

And, I certainly don’t miss dragging the coal scuttles up the ladder from the cellar to keep both stoves glowing red (the other stove was the cooking stove in the kitchen).

No. It’s not nostalgia. But, nowadays I sometimes look at the wealth of gifts under a Christmas tree and wonder if kids today wouldn’t feel a little short-changed if they had to celebrate Christmas the way we did over half a century ago?

Back then, you weren’t likely to find a whole lot in the way of “store bought” goods under the tree. Each of the kids would get a gift from Santa (via Eaton’s or Simpson’s catalogue), but, mostly, it was knitted or other hand made goods; sweaters, scarves, mitts, etc. The kids of today would likely have a few nasty words for Santa if they were treated to the same kind of gift giving. There were no X-boxes, MP3 players, video games, etc, etc. Hell, they hadn’t even invented the transistor radio back then.

But, there were always Christmas treasures to which people looked forward. For me, it was the annual Christmas box from “Granny” Gordon, or, as my mother called it, “th’ parcel frae hame”. It wasn’t that the parcel contained anything of great significance, but rather the thought behind it. It had traveled thousands of miles across a very big ocean just to say, “We love you.”

There was usually an array of knitted goods, a bottle or two of ginger wine for Ma and a carton or two of Wild Woodbine cigarettes for Da. There was an assortment of candy for the kids and six months of comics from the Sunday Post (the other six months of comics came in the summer parcel), as well as copies of “Topper” and later on, “Beezer”. My favourite strips were “The Broons” and “Oor Wullie”.

I suspect the kids of today might find such gifts a trifle tame. I hope they still grow up with some appreciation for both the reason we celebrate Christmas and the thought behind the gifts.

Maybe I really am turning into a sentimental old fool

Note: My father didn’t always get his full complement of Wild Woodbine. Granny Gordon passed on sometime around 1952, if I recall correctly, but my mother’s sisters continued the tradition of sending parcels for many years after her death. It was from one of those summer parcels which my brother Tom and I confiscated a pack of smokes for our first taste of cigarette tobacco.

It was a year or two after we moved to Bog Row in 1954. We took the cigarettes and a fistful of wooden matches and sat on the side of the “red hill” until they were gone. I didn’t have another cigarette until I was about to board the plane for my first job in Montreal in 1962.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Diary Of A Snow Shoveller

December 8: 6:00 PM. It started to snow. The first snow of the season and the wife and I took our cocktails and sat for hours by the window watching the huge soft flakes drift down from heaven. It looked like a Grandma Moses Print. So romantic we felt like newlyweds again. I love snow!

December 9: We woke to a beautiful blanket of crystal white snow covering every inch of the landscape. What a fantastic sight! Could there be a more lovely place in the whole world? Moving here was the best idea I've ever had. Shoveled for the first time in years; felt like a boy again. I did both our driveway and the sidewalks. This afternoon the snowplow came along and covered up the sidewalks and closed in the driveway, so I got to shovel again. What a perfect life.

December 12: The sun has melted all our lovely snow. What a disappointment. My neighbour tells me not to worry; we'll definitely have a white Christmas. No snow on Christmas would be awful! Bob says we'll have so much snow by the end of winter, that I'll never want to see snow again. I don't think that's possible. Bob is such a nice man, I'm glad he's our neighbour.

December 14: Snow, lovely snow; eight inches fell last night. The temperature dropped to -20. The cold makes everything sparkle so. The wind took my breath away, but I warmed up by shoveling the driveway and sidewalks. This is the life! The snowplow came back this afternoon and buried everything again. I didn't realize I would have to do quite this much shoveling, but I'll certainly get back in shape this way. I wish I wouldn't huff and puff so.

December 15: 20 inches forecast. Sold my van and bought a 4x4 Blazer. Bought snow tires for the wife's car and two extra shovels. Stocked the freezer. The wife wants a wood stove in case the electricity goes out. I think that's silly. We aren't in Alaska, after all.

December 16: Ice storm this morning. Fell on my ass on the ice in the driveway putting down salt. Hurt like hell. The wife laughed for an hour, which I think was very cruel.

December 17: Still way below freezing. Roads are too icy to go anywhere. Electricity was off for seven hours. I had to pile the blankets on to stay warm. There’s nothing to do but stare at the wife and try not to irritate her. Guess I should've bought a wood stove, but won't admit it to her. God I hate it when she's right. I can't believe I'm freezing to death in my own living room.

December 20: Electricity's back on, but had another 14" of the damn stuff last night. More shoveling. Took all day. Bloody snowplow came by twice. Tried to find a neighbour kid to shovel, but they said they're too busy playing hockey. I think they're lying. Called the only hardware store around to see about buying a snow blower, and they're out. Might have another shipment in March. I think they're lying. Bob says I have to shovel or the city will have it done and bill me. I think he's lying.

December 22: Bob was right about a white Christmas, because 13 more inches of the white crap fell today, and it's so cold it probably won't melt 'til August. Took me 45 minutes to get all dressed up to go out to shovel, and then I had to take a piss. By the time I got undressed, did my thing and dressed again, I was too tired to shovel! Tried to hire Bob (who has a plow on his truck) for the rest of the winter, but he says he's too busy. I think the bastard’s lying.

December 23: Only two inches of snow today, and it warmed up to "0". The wife wanted me to decorate the front of the house this morning. What, is she nuts!!! Why didn't she tell me to do that a month ago? She says she did, but I think she's lying.

December 24: 6". Snow packed so hard by snowplow, I broke the shovel. Thought I was having a heart attack. If I ever catch the stupid f**ker who drives that snowplow, I'll drag him through the snow and beat him to death with my broken shovel. I know he hides around the corner and waits for me to finish shoveling and then he comes down the street at 100 miles an hour and throws snow all over everywhere I've just been! Tonight the wife wanted me to sing Christmas carols with her and open our presents, but I was too busy watching for the f**king snowplow.

December 25: Merry f**cking Christmas. 20 more inches of the f**king slop tonight. Snowed in. The idea of shoveling makes my blood boil. God, I hate the snow! Then the snowplow driver came by asking for a donation and I hit him over the head with my shovel. The wife says I have a bad attitude. I think she's a f**king idiot. If I have to watch “It's a Wonderful Life” one more time, I'm going to stuff her into the microwave.

December 26: Still snowed in. Why the hell did I ever move here? It was all HER idea. She's really getting on my nerves.

December 27: Temperature dropped to -30, and the pipes froze. Plumber came after 14 hours of waiting for him. He only charged me $1,400 to replace all my pipes.

December 28: Warmed up to above -50. Still snowed in. The f**king wife is driving me crazy!!!!!

December 29: 10 more inches. Bob says I have to shovel the roof or it could cave in. That's the silliest thing I ever heard. How f**king dumb does he think I am?

December 30: Roof caved in. I beat up the snow plow driver. Now, he’s suing me for a million dollars. Not only for the beating I gave him, but also for trying to shove the broken snow shovel up his ass. The wife went home to her mother. Nine inches of snow predicted.

December 31: I set fire to what's left of the house. No more shoveling.

January 8: Feel so good. I just love those little white pills they keep giving me. But why am I tied to the f**king bed?

I lifted this bit from the web. For more Christmas humour, visit:
Joe-ks.com

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Bargain basement photo editor

It’s a stereotype, of course, but Scotsmen have a reputation as being tight with a buck. My kids often use the word cheap. I like to think that I simply have an eye for a bargain. And there’s a lot of real bargains to be found on the web in the form of freeware. Not adware, spyware or trialware, but fully functional, no strings attached freeware.

The graphic which accompanies this post was created in an application called Photo Filtre. In fact, all the graphics you see on this web log were either created, or edited, in Photo Filtre. I picked up the program a year or so ago, and it’s one of the best I’ve ever used for image editing and special effects.

And, what’s just as amazing as its’ intuitive interface and ease of use, is the fact that it’s free.

The application was developed by a guy called Antonio Da Cruz and the man deserves a five star rating for making the program available free for personal use. The application itself gets a five star rating from most distributors and users.

I’ve tried a lot of commercial programs, including some of the high cost “professional” applications with their steep learning curves. They just don’t compare. In fact, since picking up a copy of Photo Filtre, I’ve removed all those commercial programs, to save some space, since I no longer used them; I found that I could do everything I wanted to do in Photo Filtre with a lot less effort and a whole lot less frustration.

The program offers all the standard editing features (selection, clone brush, paint brush etc.) as well as a large selection of image effects, photo masks, image adjustments, thumbnail browser and much more. The program also supports batch processing to apply filters, sizing, adjustments and transformations to a large number of images at once. PhotoFiltre comes with a modern, well designed interface and is well suited for everything from simple resizing to advanced photo editing. You can also add text captions to your photos.

And, did I mention that it’s free!

The only criticism I’ve been able to find involves the fact that Photo Filtre doesn’t support “layers” or PhotoShop filters. Neither drawback is likely to be considered a major flaw by most users. PhotoShop was one of the programs I removed after installing and using Photo Filtre for several months.

So whether you think I’m “tight with a buck”, just plain cheap or you fully appreciate the fact that I really do have an eye for a bargain, check it out. If you like messing with photographs, it’s a handy-dandy little program to have lying around on your desktop.

You can find a copy of Photo Filtre by typing “Photo Filtre Free” into your browser search engine, or just click on the following link.

Photo Filtre Free



Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Weird & wacky country songs (3)

In previous posts, I’ve written about some of the weird and wacky song titles in the wonderful world of country music. The titles came from a list compiled by persons unknown, at least to me. At the time I copied the list, I forgot to write down the name of the site. So I humbly apologize for being unable to give the guy proper credit. Here’s some more songs, including some from the list.

One song that didn’t make the list was a big hit for Hank Thompson in the fifties and one of my favourites at the time. It was also a politically incorrect little number that would be unlikely to get any airplay these days. It was called “The Squaws Along The Yukon (Are Good Enough For Me)”.
“She makes her underwear,
From the hides of grizzly bear
She bathes in ice cold water ever day
Her skin I love to touch,
But I can’t touch it much
Because her fur-lined parka’s in the way.”

Hank Thompson also recorded (“The Tears Have Washed I Love You From) The Blackboard Of My Heart”. Although the song title may sound funny to-day, it was a serious ballad about love gone wrong; a real tear jerker that reached number one on the country charts back in the fifties.

Jimmy Buffett, although not technically a country singer despite his hits “Margarittaville” and “Its Five O’clock Somewhere” with Alan Jackson, deserves some recognition for some of the stranger song titles; for example; ”If The Phone Doesn’t Ring (It’s Me Not Calling You)”. He also recorded “My Head Hurts, My Feet Stink And I Don’t Love Jesus” and “Why Don’t We Get Drunk And Screw.”

Some songs are just plain weird . . . and mean. One such entry was, “Mama Get the Hammer, There’s A Fly On Papa’s Head.” Then, there’s the cover of that same song, a parody called, “Get The Hammer Mama, There’s A Head On Papa’s Fly”.

If you’re a true aficionado of country music, you’ll know that men and women don’t always react the same way to being dumped. Men often get bitter; “If You Want To Keep The Beer Cold (Put it Next To My Ex-wife’s Heart).” or “I'm So Miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here” Or, how about, “If I Can't Be Number One In Your Life (Then Number Two On You)”. Now, that’s bitter.

Some, though, are quite pleased to see their woman’s backside as she’s walking away, as in Roy Clark’s “Thank God And Greyhound She’s Gone“.

Some of the song titles were just plain silly. There was one in the list, from back in the fifties, called “I Was Lookin’ Back To See”. They gave the wrong song title, but I knew what they were referring to because I once had the original 78 rpm record. It went:
“I was lookin’ back to see,
If you were lookin’ back to see
If I was lookin’ back to see,
If you were lookin’ back at me
You were cute as you could be
Standing lookin’ back at me
And it was plain to see
That I’d enjoy your company.

I have no idea why the words are still in my head after half a century, but not even Garth Brooks could get that one to the top of the charts these days.

Then there are the songs that ask questions about the eternal mysteries of life. Songs like ”If You Can't Live Without Me, Why Aren't You Dead Yet?” Or that other old standard, “Why Do You Believe Me When I Tell You That I Love You (When You Know I've Been A Liar All My Life)?” It’s hard to say if this next question came from a guy looking for the answer to the many mysteries of life or just somebody trying out a new pick-up line. It’s called, “I Can't Get Over You, So Why Don't You Get Under Me?”

There were songs about guys overcome with guilt and begging forgiveness, “Thanks To the Cathouse, I'm In The Doghouse With You”. There were songs which seem to have been written by braggarts, and which were likely intended as double entendre: “There Ain't Enough Room in My Fruit of the Looms (To Hold All My Lovin' for You).” And there are songs that can’t be meant as anything but double entendre. Either that or I’m turning into a dirty old man. For example, “I Hate Every Bone In Your Body (Except For Mine)”.

But, that’s enough from this scribe for the day; my butt is starting to feel a little like the guy who wrote: “I Sat Down On a Beartrap (Just This Morning)”.

On second thought . . . while the songs noted above are real, there was another site with some made up song titles, by made up artists. I thought it might be interesting to make up a list of songs that might be done by someone like Toby Keith. Or the Old Rambler.

Tough as F**k (I Can Lick Any Girl In The House) – Toby Keith
These Boots Were Made for Shit-Kickin’ – Toby Keith
I Ain't Drunk, I’m Just Pukin' (So What’s Your Excuse) – Toby Keith
Watchin’ Too Many Toby Keith Videos – The Old Rambler
These Colors Don't Run: They Goose–Step! – Toby Keith

Friday, December 7, 2007

The crazy calendar caper

For those of you who don’t know, I live in a housing co-op. It’s a little different than living in a “normal” apartment building, because you get to know a lot more of your neighbours through members meetings, social functions, etc. I’ve been living in here for the past fourteen years.

This year, the Board of Directors hired a consultant to review the operations of the co-op. His regular fee was $125.00 an hour, but the co-op got him for the bargain basement price of $75.00 an hour. People really should be more careful when buying discounted goods and/or services.

Now, this particular consultant had a thing about something called “risk management”. I know a little about risk management from my years with Goodyear Canada. Yes, there was a time in my life when I was gainfully employed. Risk management, in very simple terms, is assessing the risk associated with the actions you take or decisions you make.

For example, when you come to an icy patch on the sidewalk, you walk around it or run the risk of falling on your ass. Likewise, you don’t punch your neighbour in the nose because his dog dirtied your lawn or you run the risk of being dragged off to the lock-up by the local constabulary.

Our cleaner had a couple of calendars hanging in the garbage room which housed the garbage compactor. For several years, our coordinator (manager), a woman of roughly my age of sixty-something, had give the cleaner a calendar around Christmas. These were not nudies, but calendars similar to the ones illustrated at the top of this post. They were no more revealing than the photos of Sunshine Girls published regularly in the Toronto Sun.

But, the Board of Directors and their $75.00 an hour consultant deemed them a “risk” to the co-op and demanded that they be removed as part of their new “risk management” strategy. I’m not entirely sure of the nature of the risk: it might have been any of several bonafide risks to the assets of the co-op.

For instance, some old guy like myself might have wandered into the garbage room, spotted the pictures of scantily-clad young women and died on the spot from the excitement. Or, some kid could have wandered into the garbage room and tripped over a calendar while he was walking across the wall.

At the time the Board of Directors issued their “Cease and Desist” ultimatum, the members simply chuckled.

But, a few days ago, the cleaner received an early Christmas gift from a member with a sense of humour. He gave the cleaner a Sunshine Girl calendar, leaving the cleaner in a quandary. He can’t hang the calendar in the garbage room because the Board will simply demand that he remove it or, maybe fire him. He’s afraid to hang it in his garage lest his wife cut him . . er . . . cease to perform her wifely duties.

The Board and their overpaid consultant have got him so nervous he’s even afraid his own daughter, a law student, might sue him for sexism if he hangs it in his workshop.

The Board might have a suggestion as to what he could do with it, but I’m sure there’s a law against inserting a calendar in any body cavity under any circumstances. The cleaner has some ideas of his own as to what he might do with the calendar. But, as I’ve already noted, it’s probably against the law, even if the chosen cavity belongs to someone on the Board of Directors.

And, for this exercise in risk management, they paid the charlatan consultant $75.00 an hour.
Go figure!

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

The blasphemous teddy bear

It seems every blogger on the net has had a few words to say about Gillian Gibbons and the blasphemous teddy bear. So why not me?

British elementary school teacher Gillian Gibbons was arrested in Sudan, on November 25, 2007, accused of insulting Islam's Prophet by letting her class of 7-year-olds name a teddy bear Mohammed. Ms. Gibbons teaches at Unity High School, one of a number of exclusive British-run schools in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum.

What was the nature of her crime? She asked her class of six and seven year olds to dress up and name a teddy bear, and keep a diary of his outings. Her young class was due to study the behavior and habitat of bears. The bear was to serve as a kind of “case study”. And it would have passed without incident, except for the name the children chose for their bear: Muhammad.

Following a quick trial, Gibbons was sentenced to 15 days in prison for insulting Islam. She could have faced a maximum of 40 lashes and/or a year in prison under Sudan's legal code, which is based on British law but modified to include Sharia punishments. Sharia (Sari-ah) is the body of Islamic religious law and deals with many aspects of day-to-day life, including politics, business, family, sexuality, hygiene, and social issues.

Demonstrators wielding ceremonial swords took to the streets in Sudan's desert capital to vent their anger at Gibbons. A crowd of about 1,000 young men streamed out of mosques to gather outside Khartoum's presidential palace, later marching to the British Embassy and burning newspapers bearing images of the 54 year old teacher. The crowd was demanding that the teacher be executed following her conviction on charges of blasphemy.

It is believed that the treatment of Gibbons was Sudan's way of censuring the British government for making a solution to the slaughter in Darfur a cornerstone of its foreign policy. Religion has often been used in Muslim countries for political ends.

CNN reported on Monday that Gibbons had been pardoned by the president of Sudan and released into the custody of the British Consulate. Saner heads prevail.

But, Muslims must be aware that such incidents can do much to harm the image of Islam. Angry young men marching through the streets, brandishing swords and demanding the death of this woman, perpetuate the image of Islam as a religion of fanatics. However, I suspect the Prophet would not be happy with the failure of these men to control their anger or to show forgiveness for a transgression committed with neither knowledge nor intent.

But, while Ms. Gibbons may have been unaware of the taboo against naming inanimate objects or animals Mohammed, the same cannot be said of the US company, which, within days of the incident in Sudan, had posted an ad on the web, selling stuffed teddy bears wearing a t-shirt proclaiming, “My name is Muhammed.”

The ad encourages people to show their support against hatred and intolerance by “buying and displaying the one Muhammed selling worldwide, Teddy Muhammed”. It’s an interesting concept; thumb your nose at the fanatics by intentionally insulting all Muslims, including those moderates who publicly denounced the events in the Sudan.

In small, greyed out print, there is the claim that, “This one Teddy Bear is capturing attention to important facts about how children and adults can’t even have a stuffed toy without fear of harm. Your purchase supports us in our fight to end intolerance.”

The episode didn’t happen because a child had a stuffed animal. It happened because the stuffed bear was given the name of Islam’s Prophet. The incident was blown out of all reasonable proportions by a group of fanatics intent on making a political statement. The matter was settled because men of reason stood their ground against the religious zealots and took appropriate action to right the wrong. Gillian Gibbons, by now, is likely home safe in England, which is as it should be.

But, those people selling Teddy Muhammed seem intent on fanning the flames of a fire that had been all but extinguished. And, they are doing so in pursuit of the almighty dollar. The “fight against hatred and intolerance” is just another sales pitch.

New word for the day - blas·phe·my (blăs'fə-mē) n
  • A contemptuous or profane act, utterance, or writing concerning God or a sacred entity.
  • The act of claiming for oneself the attributes and rights of God.
  • An irreverent or impious act, attitude, or utterance in regard to something considered inviolable or sacrosanct.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Blackwater - unique & timely solutions

If you were to go to the website of Blackwater, often referred to as the world’s largest mercenary army, you would find the following:

Innovation Begins with Experience
Blackwater Worldwide efficiently and effectively integrates a wide range of resources and core competencies to provide unique and timely solutions that exceed our customers’ stated needs and expectations.

We are guided by integrity, innovation, and a desire for a safer world. Blackwater Worldwide professionals leverage state-of-the-art training facilities, professional program management teams, and innovative manufacturing and production capabilities to deliver world-class, customer-driven solutions.

Our corporate leadership and dedicated family of exceptional employees adhere to essential core values - chief among these are integrity, innovation, excellence, respect, accountability, and teamwork.

Huh. Just who in the hell are these guys again.

Oh, yes. They’re mercenaries who provide “security” services to anyone with the money to pay them. Their biggest customer these days is the US State Department. So why the double-speak from their website? Could it be that they’re a little bit embarrassed by the way their “professional program management teams” are conducting business in Iraq these days?

According to an unidentified spokesperson, “Blackwater guards (a dedicated family of exceptional employees?) reacted lawfully to an attack on one of its convoys.” The spokesperson was commenting on an August 16, 2007 incident in which, according to initial reports, eleven Iraqi civilians were killed and fifteen others wounded. The latest news reports put the death toll at seventeen, with twenty-three others wounded when a Blackwater security detail opened fire in Nisoor Square in Baghdad.

One might reasonably ask whose law they were acting lawfully under. Back in 2004, the US State Department granted Blackwater (as well as other private security contractors) immunity from prosecution under not only Iraqi law, but under the US Uniform Code of Military Justice. Nor does this private contractor have to worry about following the Geneva Conventions.

It is also unlikely Blackwater employees can be tried in the United States for crimes outside that jurisdiction, which means that Blackwater is accountable to no one. (A US rights group announced it was filing a petition to have the courts decide if they can be tried in a civil proceeding on behalf of a survivor and the families of three victims.)

The shooting prompted a wave of outrage in Iraq about the activities of private US security firms protecting diplomats and foreign workers, and calls for those responsible for the deaths to be tried in Iraqi courts.

An official Iraqi investigation, ordered by Iraqi prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, claims guards from the US security firm had not been shot at before they opened fire on Iraqi civilians in Baghdad. This contention is supported by accounts from the first (legitimate) US soldiers to arrive on the scene, who claimed no evidence was found to support Blackwater contentions that they had come under fire.

According to a US congressional report released a month or so ago, Blackwater has been involved in 195 shooting incidents in Iraq since 2005. In 84% of those cases, the report claims, Blackwater personnel were the first to open fire.

And, apparently, it’s not just the shootings of innocent civilians by private contractors in Iraq that has Washington concerned. Federal prosecutors are investigating allegations that employees of Blackwater smuggled weapons into Iraq that may have ended up in the hands of a designated terrorist organization, the PKK (Kurdistan Workers Party).

The Raleigh News & Observer reported that two former Blackwater employees are cooperating with federal authorities investigating the accusations. They pleaded guilty earlier this year to possession of stolen firearms that had been shipped in interstate or foreign commerce. In their plea agreements, which call for a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, the men agreed to testify in any future proceedings.

Back in July, Turkey officially protested to US officials that they had seized US weapons from captured PKK terrorists. The Turkish government provided the US with serial numbers from the weapons which are now being traced by the FBI.

A joint US/Iraqi commission is looking into the incident in Nisoor Square to try and sort out what really happened. The US is conducting its own investigation into the illegal smuggling of weapons into Iraq.

Neither is likely to result in anything more than a mild reprimand to any of the offending parties. A few foot soldiers will be designated as bad apples and have their butts kicked but the big wigs with the big wallets will walk away.

We’ve seen it all before; another incident; another investigation; another whitewash.

Friday, November 30, 2007

Updates, odds and ends

Update – Poetry.com
Over the past couple of weeks, I have received different email from four different organizations, all telling me how wonderful my poetry is, and offering membership and all manner of plaques, pins, medallions, coffee mugs, etc, etc, etc. The last was from an outfit called Noble House with offices in London, Paris and New York. The problem, of course, is that Yahoo tells me the emails all originated from the same source in Maryland. Uh-huh.

Dear Matt,
Recently, I was discussing the appointment of this year's Poet Fellows with various editors, colleagues, and publishers. The Poet Fellowship is an elite group of international writers who share a common passion for writing. In recent years, the number of Poet Fellows has grown with members from all over the world. It started in London and then quickly spread to New York, Paris, and Venice . . . and now its members literally circle the globe. It is with great enthusiasm that I am officially inviting you to join this legendary group as a Poet Fellow.

In addition to the honor and prestige afforded by being a member of this organization, they are offering a Poet Fellow Pin and a limited edition medallion at a cost of only $74.95.

Apparently, this scam is one of the most persistent on the net. The reason they can get away with this stuff is that they maintain a façade of legitimacy by actually publishing books (anthologies) from time to time and even holding annual “conventions” with an attendance of up to 4,000 would be poets. But, the biggest reason they get away with it is that people, once they come to realize they’ve been scammed, are too embarrassed to admit it.

There are literally dozens of sites out there reporting on scams or suspicious activity. You can utilize these sites to gather information on any activity you may be thinking about getting involved in. I’ve found RipOffReports(.Com) particularly helpful.
Related Posts: I won! I won! Oh shit.


Free software links
In some of my posts, I’ve pointed out the benefits of freeware and free open source software. Freeware is fully functional software that is available without charge and with no strings attached. Open source software is essentially the same thing, except that there is an additional bonus in that you can also download and modify the source code if you wish.

In order to be considered free software, users must have the following four freedoms:

  • The freedom to run the program, for any purpose.
  • The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
  • The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.
  • The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
For more information about free software, visit the Free Software Foundation.

I’ve added a new links category, “Five Star Freeware”. I’ll include the links to any freeware apps I review on this site, so that readers can navigate to these websites without difficulty.


The Music Player
You might have noticed that I’ve changed the MP3 player to something a little more elaborate. The player is provided free (for a little advertising and a link) by MyFlashFetish. I’ll be trying to update the play list over the next couple of weeks.

It’s annoying as hell to have the player start playback from the beginning every time you move from one post to another, but that’s the nature of the beast. One way to avoid this nuisance is to click on the month of the posts, rather that the post itself. By clicking on November, for example, all posts published in November will appear on a single page, allowing you to scroll from post to post and allowing the MP3 player to play continually.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Open source software

In the early days of computers, idealism was very much alive and well on the software development side of the equation. Software developers shared their knowledge, including computer code, with one another freely. By doing so they could tap into the collective knowledge of fellow professionals to solve any problems they might encounter. By allowing others to modify their code, they could develop software that was stable, user friendly and readily available to the end user at little or no charge.

These idealistic individuals actually believed that the benefits of personal computing should be available to everyone, not just the well off and wealthy.

And then came Microsoft.

To give Bill Gates and his buddy Steve their due, Microsoft has done a pretty good job of making computers user friendly and opening up the wonderful world of personal computing to the average man (or woman) on the street. The Windows environment is easy to work in and relatively stable for the average user. But . . .

I’ve been using Windows XP for several years. And, over those years, I’ve had to activate (or re-activate) the system four times. It’s not a lengthy process and some people may consider it a minor inconvenience. To me, however, it’s a major infringement on my privacy rights. And, I also object to the “guilty until proven innocent” attitude of Microsoft’s activation process.

Judges routinely order criminals to wear electronic monitoring devices, after a hearing or trial has confirmed their guilt. Microsoft demands that they be permitted to conduct electronic surveillance of my computer system, without the benefit of a hearing. After paying to use their damned operating system, they want me to prove that I’m innocent of piracy any time they decide it’s convenient for them. It would be unacceptable to most people if they were required to contact Ford or GM to get permission to re-start their automobile after changing the oil or installing new spark plugs. Why is it acceptable behaviour from Microsoft?

And Windows Vista is even more restrictive; you are simply not allowed to move the operating system to new hardware. As well, the Microsoft activation process is being applied to most, if not all, of the Microsoft product line.

Then, there’s the cost.

Fortunately, there are alternatives to Microsoft Windows. Most incarnations of Linux (Red Hat, Ubuntu, etc.) have a GUI (graphical user interface), an application task bar and an office document processing environment, thanks to open source software. And, since it’s free, it can be used on any system, with any hardware, on as many computers as you might choose to install it.

You can get (or make) “live” CDs that allow you to transport the operating system to any computer via a bootable disc. You choose as many applications as you need, all at little or no cost.

Microsoft is not happy with open source software.

While claiming it doesn’t want to litigate the issue, Microsoft is demanding that it be paid royalties on patents they “own”. I understand the concept of copyright, but I’m not exactly sure how anyone can patent software anymore than they can patent mathematics. You can copyright a song, but you can’t patent the idea of a song and then demand royalties from anyone who writes a song. But that’s what Microsoft is claiming; that they’re entitled to patent the idea behind a computer application.

The European Union has turned thumbs down on software patents. And rightly so. The United States has been allowing people to register patents, but some recent court cases suggest that any legal action for patent infringement will meet with limited success.

Microsoft wants nothing less than complete control over the computer operating system market. Their only competition is from Mac and Gnu/Linux.

It’s clear that Microsoft is afraid of the concept of open source software, otherwise they wouldn’t be turning their considerable legal and financial might against those who produce it.

Open source software is still a small market to be sure, but it’s here to stay; and, it’s gaining ground in the end user market; losing it’s “for geeks only” connotation. And, as the many manifestations of Linux become easier to use for the average Joe, it will continue to erode Microsoft’s current advantage in the market place.

And, you simply can’t beat the price. That’s making Microsoft very nervous.

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Second hand goods

There are a lot of good guitar builders out there, making good quality instruments. And, over the years, I’ve owned a few. But, my first guitar was an inexpensive “Simpson’s Sears special”, a Silvertone acoustic flat top. Specially priced for the beginner market back in the fifties, it cost less than $30.00. But, to put that price tag in context, my Dad’s weekly paycheck was just over $58.00 net, which made the guitar pretty special. And, I’ve never been without a guitar in all the years since.

These days I play a Washburn D10SDL, and I also own a Norman B-20-12, a 12 string guitar that’s hand made in Canada. OK, it’s made in Quebec, but whether they know it or not, they’re still part of Canada. Both my current guitars were gifts from family members, just like the first one I got from my Dad over half a century ago.

Recently, while surfing the net, I came across an article on Gallotone guitars. Now, if I were to mention names like Gibson, Gretsch, Martin, Ephinone, etc, everyone who has ever learned how to strum a chord would know what I was talking about. But, I’m wondering how many people out there can tell me what a Gallotone guitar looks like or where they were made? That’s what I thought.

The Gallotone Champion guitar model was a 3/4 size steel string flat-top acoustic made from laminated woods. It was manufactured in South Africa by the Gallo company during the 50's and 60's. It was intended for the beginner market and sold for under $20.00 US.

If I were to tell you that John Lennon once played a Gallowtone Champion, would you know where I’m going with this piece? Sure you would, unless you’re a complete stranger to this web log.

A few years back (eight to be exact), the Gallotone guitar once played by John Lennon sold for 155,500 pounds ($251,700) at a Rock'n'Roll memorabilia sale held by Sotheby's London. There is no indication anywhere that the purchaser is a guitar player. If he were, he would have spent a grand or two on a top of the line instrument that he could play on a daily basis without turning his fingers to hamburger; instead of a worthless piece of junk.

But the man was not a musician; he was a collector of memorabilia. He didn’t buy the guitar to play it, he bought it as a trophy so he could display it and proclaim proudly to anyone who might see it that it was once played by John Lennon. “Yessireebob. Worth every penny of the quarter of a million dollars I spent for it.”

No. I do not envy the man’s wealth and I don’t dispute his right to spend his money in any manner he sees fit. And, I sure as hell don’t envy his intelligence or lack thereof.

It was a cheap beginner’s guitar that plays no better today than it did back in the fifties when Lennon bought it. Its magic was never in the guitar; the magic was in the hands, heart and soul of the man who played it. And, no matter how much the buyer might be willing to spend, he can never buy the magic.

And the same holds true for the guitar once played, but never owned by Sir Paul McCartney, which sold at auction last year for $675,000.00. The guitar was accompanied by a letter from Sir Paul authenticating the fact he had once played that guitar as a boy. The owner, a boyhood friend of McCartney’s sold the guitar to “build a nest egg” for his pending retirement. He has obviously been thinking about his nest egg for a long time if he has managed to keep the instrument in any kind of decent shape over that length of time.

The guitar's buyer, the president of an auction company, is quoted as saying: "This is such an important piece of rock history and I am an extremely happy man tonight. Without this guitar, the Beatles may never have existed and it is a fantastic acquisition." An acquisition? I thought he was buying a guitar.

It may be a piece of rock history, but as such it belongs in a museum, not in the hands of a private collector who wants to bath, albeit second hand, in the brilliance of one of the world’s finest guitar players.

It’s hard to figure out these “collectors”. Is it their colossal ego or just plain stupidity that makes them pay that much money for second hand goods.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Record companies & royalties

Found an interesting bit of trivia on the web just a few days ago while researching another article for this web log. On a web site called “How it works”, a brief article in the side bar claims that country super star, Merle Haggard, had never received a recording royalty cheque throughout his long career in country music, until he recently recorded an album for the indie punk-rock label Epitaph.

I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking, “The guy is a country music legend. He’s had thirty-seven top ten country singles, with twenty-three of them number one hits. There’s no way any artist can be that successful and never cash a royalty cheque.” But, you’re wrong. To fully understand how such a thing might happen, you’d have to read several lengthy articles on how recording contracts actually work. I’ll try and give the short lecture in this post.

Let’s say you’re an up and coming young country singer who has just signed his/her first recording contract with a major record label. You sign the standard industry contract stating your cut will be 10% of total album sales. The record company gives you an advance of $100,000.00 or so to tide you over until your album is released, and you’re happily drifting along on cloud nine. The dollar signs are dancing in your head, rendering the brain next to useless.

So let’s see if we can’t work this out together. If you sell a million records at $15.00 apiece, that’s 15 million dollars; and your take would be a cool 1.5 million, right? Well, no, not exactly. You royalties will be based on the wholesale price, not the retail price. But that’s fair. If your record wholesales for nine dollars, you still make $900,000.00. Unless your album is sold through a record or CD club, or some discount retail outlet like Costco who usually pay a lower wholesale price. But, it’s still a pretty good deal, right?

Well, maybe. But there are a few expenses to be deducted from your royalties. Many record companies charge an up front “packaging fee” of up to 25% of the artist’s royalties. Then, there’s the cost of recording the songs. These costs alone can easily run up to several hundreds of thousands of dollars. You might do your recording in a studio owned by the record company, but you won’t get the studio time for free. They’ll charge you for it, usually with a considerable mark up.

There’s production costs, costs for graphic design, royalties to the writers, advertising and promotion of the album and don’t forget your advance. Then there’s the free CDs distributed for promotional purposes and to radio stations. And, don’t forget the hold back for CDs and tapes that might be returned later by retailers.

And, few records are released these days without at least one video for television; no one wants to look at a picture of Toby Keith for three and a half minutes while listening to one of his songs on CMT. So add on a few more hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Once it’s all added up, you’ll be down on your knees praying for a gold or platinum album. Otherwise you could end up owing the record company. And consider this, the music industry publishes tens of thousands of new albums every year, and only a small percentage of them are going to go gold (500,000 records sold) or platinum (1,000,000 records sold). You have about a 1-in-20 chance of producing an album that's a major hit.

Singer Courtney Love had this to say in an open letter to recording artists: “How do record companies get away with a 95% failure rate that would be totally unacceptable in any other business? Record companies keep almost all the profits. Recording artists get paid a tiny fraction of the money earned by their music. That allows record executives to be incredibly sloppy in running their companies and still create enormous amounts of cash for the corporations that own them.”

“The royalty rates granted in every recording contract are very low to start with and then companies charge back every conceivable cost to an artist's royalty account. Artists pay for recording costs, video production costs, tour support, radio promotion, sales and marketing costs, packaging costs and any other cost the record company can subtract from their royalties. Record companies also reduce royalties by "forgetting" to report sales figures, miscalculating royalties and by preventing artists from auditing record company books.”

And this item, from her blog: Courtney Love wants to follow the example of rock band Radiohead, who has allowed fans to download their new album "In Rainbows" and pay whatever they wanted. She too will release her music, for free, online.

Go ahead. Ask me why I don’t feel at all guilty about visiting “Torrent Portal” or “Pirate Bay” from time to time.

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Water, water, everywhere . . .

Right now, in my refrigerator, there are several bottles of bottled water. And under a desk in my bedroom, there is an unopened case of the same bottled water. It is the last of three cases of water bought by my wife who drinks a lot of bottled water. When my wife and youngest daughter were lugging the stuff into the apartment, I raised my eyebrows in a questioning manner. “It was on sale!” was the chorus.

Also, in the kitchen of my apartment, there is a contraption called a “sink”. In the sink there are taps which you turn to make water run into the sink. The tap marked with a “C” gives you clear, cold; government tested water, certified fit for human consumption. And, it’s free.

Now, cold running water, delivered directly to your house or apartment, has been around for many years. Even back in the fifties, living on Bog Row down in Cape Breton, we had cold running water. Of course, if you ventured out into the countryside to visit Aunt Daisy, things got a little more complicated. There you had to prime the pump, and then pump the pump handle to get the water running before you could get a cool, refreshing drink . . . of free water.

Now, don’t anyone get the wrong impression here. I don’t begrudge a case or two of bottled water to anyone, especially my wife of nigh on to forty years. But . . .

Let’s look at some facts.

Nestlé Waters Canada has applied to extend its permit to pump 3.6 million litres of water a day in Aberfoyle and 1.1 million litres a day in Hillsburg for the next five years. That application drew about 6,000 letters of objection into the office of Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment.

According to Council of Canadians national chairperson Maude Barlow, “local residents need to be aware that a water crisis happening around the world can also happen in Guelph. Droughts are not just happening in Third World countries but in northern China, the Middle East, Australia and parts of the United States. It's a myth (in Canada) that we have so much water that we can afford to take it away, sell it and it'll never run out."

That, in and of itself, should be enough to make proponents of bottled water sit up and take notice. But, there’s another concern being overlooked by the environmentalists which is all too obvious to dumb old country boys like myself. If Nestle is drawing water from the same source as the local tap water, just why in hell are people paying for their stuff.

Now, consider this little news item from Reuters (South Africa). “Manufacturers of bottled water have hit back at accusations that they may be ripping-off consumers by selling tap water. Nestlé South Africa says its Pure Life product is obtained from an internationally approved source (unidentified) that is tested every six months. It has refuted allegations that Nestlé uses tap water and markets it as spring water.”

And, Coke has also worked to block public knowledge of its water source. Just a short time ago, Consumers International gave a Bad Product award to Dasani (water bottled by Coke), stating the honor was due to "pushing marketing into the realms of the ridiculous" by packaging water that came from the same source as tap water.

But, there are others guilty of “pushing marketing into the realms of the ridiculous”.

Claridges in London, one of the best known hotels in the world boasts three restaurants. It is now offering a "water menu" featuring more than 30 worldwide varieties of bottled water; iceberg water from Newfoundland, OGO water from the Netherlands which contains 35 times more oxygen than usual, water from New Zealand's finest volcanic springs, Tasmanian Rain, etc, etc. The cost? Anywhere from seven to thirty dollars a bottle.

And consider this item from Reuters (London), which claims, “Restaurants are pushing customers into buying expensive bottled water instead of offering them tap water for free, the government's consumer watchdog said on Friday. A five-star hotel in London charges 50 pounds (roughly 75 dollars) a litre and even chain restaurants charge 3.80 pounds (five dollars) for bottled mineral water.”

The article goes on to claim that a recent survey found that nine out of every 10 restaurants (in London) were pushing consumers to buy bottled water and failed to offer them free tap water.

Maker of horror films, David Cronenberg, once said, “The secret to a good horror film is to take ordinary events and extend them to their ultimate conclusion.” How about this for a possible horror scenario?

Coke and Pepsi buy the Great Lakes. Manufacturing concerns are forced to pay such high prices for their water that they move out of the country leaving millions unemployed. The public is forced to pay through the nose for Dasani and Aquafina. There is rioting in the streets of Toronto and hordes of thirsty, unemployed easterners are prepared to invade Alberta and BC to wrest control of their water supply.

Yeah, I know. It’ll never happen. By the time we get around to it, the Yanks will have already invaded Alberta and BC and there’ll be no water left.

Friday, November 16, 2007

Screamer - free internet radio

In my last post I wrote about some nut-bar who spent 160 thousand dollars on a 200 year old bottle of vinegar. Nothing particularly wrong with that, except that the man was a oenophile; someone who appreciates or collects wine. So what if it came in a wine bottle with a Chateau Lafite label, it was still nothing more than expensive (very expensive) vinegar. And, you can pick up a bottle of vinegar for under two bucks at “No Frills”. The guy was not a savvy shopper.

I, on the other hand, have an eye for a bargain. My kids interpret that as cheap, but that’s beside the point.

Some of the best deals available out there in cyberspace are in the realm of freeware. Freeware is made available in a variety of disguises, under various distribution licenses. But freeware applications have one thing in common. They’re free. That means no charge and no strings; no banner ads or spyware and no shutting down after 30 days. Now, that’s a bargain!

A few months back I picked up a copy of Screamer, a free internet radio application. The application was developed by a man called David Zidar who lives in Sweden where he studied Computer Science at Mälardalen University. Do not ask me how to pronounce his last name; I have no desire to demonstrate my ignorance in public. Wait a minute, try: eaz-dar. Amazing what you can find on the web these days.

As you can see from the screenshot at the top of the page, there’s no splashy interface. But, it works, and, it works well. Just what does it do? It’s a bloody radio, didn’t I already mention that.

According to the web site, “There is little reason to listen to commercial FM radio anymore, it is an old medium that provides little choice of music and is saturated with ads. For the last couple of years there has been an alternative, streaming internet radio; an alternative that has been somewhat complicated to use. Screamer Radio attempts to remedy this problem by bringing most of the required steps into a single, easy to use, freeware program.”

The application comes with hundreds of “preset” internet radio stations, from every genre of music imaginable: classic rock, jazz and blues, folk and country, reggae, rap and hip hop, etc, etc. You name it; it’s there. One of my favourite stations is from Mayo:
Midwest Irish radio

And, you can not only listen to the music, but you can record it using the built in record feature. There are no ads, no spyware and there’s no cost, hidden or otherwise. Nor will it shut down after 30 days.

You can check it all out on the Screamer web site, then, download your free copy.
Go to: Screamer – Free Internet Radio

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Bottle of wine, fruit of the vine

"Actually, I find it a rather backward little entry, lacking balance and texture; a little too austere for my taste."

Huh. Run that by me again. Oh, you’re talking about the wine.


I’ve always found the rituals associated with wine tasting to be a little pretentious. It all looks so complex, like the wine itself.

Now, let’s see, what do I remember from Wine Tasting 101? Wines described as backward are undeveloped and not ready to drink; they have to be aged. They’re often young and tannic, and may also be described as austere. The texture of a wine describes how the wine feels in the mouth; is it silky, velvety, rounded, or smooth? Wines said to have balance have a harmonious combination of tannin, acidity, texture and flavour. Balance is a vital attribute of a good wine. Uh-huh.

Admittedly, I know absolutely nothing about wine tasting. I am sometimes a wine drinker, but wine tasting is definitely beyond my capacity. To me there are only two kinds of wine; stuff that’s drinkable and stuff that isn’t.

Nor do I have any desire to learn about wine tasting. Did you know that tasters spit, er . . ., excuse me, expectorate the wine after swirling it around in the mouth and allowing it to brush the palette. I wouldn’t even consider doing that with a cheap bottle of 999 (a port wine most commonly associated with bootleggers in my younger days in Cape Breton). It was an indelicate little wine, both dense and complex. OK, the wine wasn’t all that complex and I was just dense.

I know what you’re thinking. Just why in the hell is he talking about wine?

Because, dear reader, as I was surfing the web, looking for nothing in particular and going nowhere at all, I came across an article on the world’s most expensive wines. And, I have a thing about people who pay outrageous prices for commodities of dubious value, be it Barry Bonds’ baseballs, OJ’s lucky suit or John Kennedy’s rocking chair. The one thing most of these people have in common, besides too much money, is a definite and definitive lack of common sense.

In 1985, Christie’s auction house sold one bottle of wine for $160,000. It was a bottle of Bordeaux, a 1787 Chateau Lafite, and, according to The Guinness Book of World Records it is still the world's most expensive bottle of wine. Its great age alone would have ensured a good price but what really made it special, particularly to American collectors, and ensured the record price tag were the initials Th.J. etched in the glass. Th.J. was, of course, Thomas Jefferson, one time president (and founding father) of the United States.

In addition to his duties as a statesman, Jefferson was also an avid oenophile. That’s right a oenophile, pronounced zee-new-file. Isn’t that a great word? An oenophile is a lover of wine. Oenophiles are also known as wine aficionados or connoisseurs. They are people who appreciate or collect wine. Uh-huh.

While most people will marvel at the price tag of 160 thousand dollars, I find myself marveling at the lack of grey matter which could be attributed to the purchaser. Is he perhaps unaware that he could get just as pissed on a five dollar bottle of Zing? Would he really pay that kind of money to roll the stuff around in his mouth and spit it out?

Actually, neither question is of any import, because the wine in no longer drinkable. The outside limit for a Bordeaux to remain fit for drinking is 50 years. So what the buyer really paid all that money for was to let the bottle, with its fancy label, sit on a shelf and gather dust. He got diddly-squat for his money, except bragging rights to a very expensive bottle of vinegar.

Unless, of course, another dummy should come along and offer to buy it.

Monday, November 12, 2007

I won! I won! (The last word)

I really didn’t intend to have a Part 3 to this post, but I just got another Email from my friends at Poetry.com and the International Society of Poets. I guess they didn’t get my Email explaining that I don’t really intend to let them publish my poem.

Actually, I got two Emails, one apologizing for being unable to process my application for membership in the International Society of Poets because their server was down. Maybe I should tell them that I never returned their application, so it didn’t matter a rats ass if their server was down or not.

The other was a “suggestion” that I invite family and friends to visit Poetry.com and review my poem. They obviously didn’t think a poet of my artistic vision was capable of composing my own Email, so they took the liberty of writing one for me. Just fill in the Email addresses of the family and friends I want to send it to and click the little button. The Email appears below.

Dear Family and Friends,
I am in the middle of a great online poetry competition. I have the chance to win some great prizes, including an iPod. I really want to win, and all I need are votes from my family and friends. You simply need to click on a link, read my poem, and rate it. If I get enough votes, I win, it’s that easy! Please use the link below to vote for my poem, “States of Being.” Please forward this to anyone else you know that could help me out. You can also use the link below on your Facebook or MySpace page to help me receive even more votes. This is a great way to help me share my poetry with the world!
Thanks very much for your vote. I will keep you posted if I win. Wish me luck!
Best regards, Matt Todd

You will note that the link does not appear in this post. Just in case anyone amongst my family or friends might be tempted by the nonsense these people are sending out. And the Email now resides in the isolation room of my virus protection application; can’t be too careful with this stuff.

Apparently there’s a few more individuals out there who have decided to have a little fun with Poetry.com. Somewhere out there in cyber space, is a guy named David Taub, a real life poet, who writes: failure is impossible at poetry.com, the website where every poem is a semifinalist. This guy tried, unsuccessfully, to get a rejection slip from the company. I reprint one of his submissions under the “fair use” provisions of Canada’s copyright laws. It was submitted under the name “Wadda Ass Iyam” and the poem is entitled “Yer Gotta Larf”.

Yew gotta larf at any moreon
who could write, "your poem was selected
for publication, and as a contest semi-finalist, on the basis of your unique talent
and artistic vision."
when we all know this is about as artistic
as vomitting on the neigbour's porch.
Burp... huey... excuse me while I be artistic on your cat. so much for
the vision . . . I never saw your cat.
Now let's get down to the real truth.
You hope I am fooled into parting with
my cash to see this in your anthology.
Wot if NO-ONE bought your books, mugs
plaques, keyrings? (have you thought of musical toilet-roll holders?)
I look forward to receiving your standard letter telling me how artistic this drivel is. If nothing else, I get a free envelope
which I can recycle.

Uh-huh, you guessed it; the damn thing won the “Editor’s Choice” award and was selected as a semi-finalist.

But, for every guy like David Taub or myself, looking to have some fun with this silliness, there are thousands of people out there getting hurt, emotionally and financially by this bunch of rip off artists. They prey on the dreams, vanity and gullibility of would be poets by using flattery and by dangling the (faint) hope of winning cash and/or prizes.

Poetry.com is also known by the following names: International Library of Poetry, National Library of Poetry, Watermark Press and the International Society of Poets. They also run a sister site for “photographers”, along with a photography contest. The site is called picture.com.

Stay away from these assholes. They’re a joke, even if they can’t recognize
one.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

I won! I won! (Part 2)

I just got another e-mail from the International Society of Poets. They want to publish my poem, based on “my unique talent and vision”. They believe “it will add to the importance and appeal” of their book. Someone call an ambulance; I think I’m about to faint from the excitement. Or puke. Or something. Here’s what they had to say:

“Recently, we informed you by mail and by email that our editors have certified your poem "States of Being" as a semi-finalist in our International Open Poetry Contest.”

“As I also mentioned in my letter, and in celebration of the unique talent that you have displayed, we wish to publish your poem in what promises to be one of the most highly sought-after collections of poetry we have ever published. Immortal Verses will be a classic, coffee-table quality hardbound volume printed on fine-milled paper specifically selected to last for generations. It will make a handsome addition to any library, a treasured family keepsake, and a highly-valued personal gift. And best of all, this magnificent volume will showcase the poetry of Matt Todd on an entire page itself!”

“Before going any further, Matt, let me make one thing clear . . . your poem was selected for publication based on your unique talent and artistic vision. We believe it will add to the importance and appeal of this edition.”

Uh-huh. And, I assume I’ll get a complimentary copy of this book, since my poem is going to be published in it. Uh-huh. I see, I only have to pay the discounted price of $49.95 plus shipping and handling. And, if I want to have a brief autobiography printed on an adjacent page, they’ll only charge me a nominal fee of $25.00.

Let’s see, that’s $75.00 plus $14.00 shipping and handling for a wall plaque and membership in the Society, $50.00 plus $8.00 shipping and handling for the book and another $25.00 to publish a brief autobiography. That’s $147.00 for the whole thing. But, they’ll also provide laminated cards with my poem on them (for a slight fee of course) so I can distribute them to friends and family who may object to paying $49.95 for a copy of the book. And, I can also get my poem printed on coffee mugs, tot bags, sweats, calendars, etc., etc.

That sounds like a fair sized investment, but still, given my “unique talent and artistic vision” I may have a shot at that grand prize of $10,000.00. OK, what do I have to do?

“Regarding the publication of your poetry, if you have not already returned your proof with your approval to publish, you must now proofread your poem, which appears on your Artist's Proof. Please carefully review your poem for typographical errors and make any necessary changes.”

OK, let’s have a look at the Artist’s Proof. Hey, wait a minute. Why is my poem full of asterisks? What the hell is h***? Are they telling me a man with my unique talent and artistic vision can’t say “hell” in their damn book? And just what in the devil have they got against the de***? Why are they branding my “work of art” with asterisks? Are these guys related to the dumb ass who branded baseballs Barry Bonds balls with an asterisk? It’s time these people got a piece of my mind.

Dear Howard,
As a man of unique talent and vision, I must take exception to your interference with the artistic integrity of my work. A true artist such as myself cannot, will not, have his art compromised on the whim of a censor who obviously doesn’t recognize a masterpiece of modern literature when he sees one. Your censorship of “States of Being” is inexcusable and I will not tolerate such behaviour from those of lesser genius than myself. Therefore, I will not permit my work to be butchered on the pages of any book you publish.
Respectfully,
Matt

That should give those scam artists something to think about. Sometimes the internet can be so much fun!

To read more on the Society of Poets rip off, visit:
ripoffreport.com

Saturday, November 10, 2007

I won! I won! Oh, shit.

A couple of weeks back I was looking for a site to host the MP3 files I planned to make available for readers to listen to and/or download. I found a great file storage site, called FileDen and also a free MP3 player widget from MyFlashFetish. All free.

However, to get to the free stuff, you had to wade through several pages of ads for any number of “fantastic offers”. I read most of them briefly, then clicked on the “No Thanks” button. Except for one; an amateur poetry contest offering a $10,000.00 first prize. Their material claims they are the world’s largest poet’s society and they have had poems submitted by such notables as Bill Clinton and Johnny Cash.

Johnny Cash? My hero! So I wrote a poem and sent it right off to them. Just for fun. It was not a good poem.

It's two weeks later and a few days ago I received an e-mail telling me I was awarded an “Editor’s Choice” award for my submission. Wow. Kinda makes your chest puff out and your head swell. Here’s what they had to say:


Dear Matt,
“Not long ago, our Editors reviewed the thousands of submissions entered in our International Open Amateur Poetry Contest, and they awarded your poem the prestigious Editor's Choice Award. This is an honor awarded to only 12% of the submissions we receive. Now that the first round of the judging process is complete, your poem will enter the next level of judging, becoming eligible for the $10,000 Annual Grand Prize that will be awarded in January 2008. We wish you the best of luck with this next phase of the contest.”

That’s enough praise to send a vain old man riding off on cloud nine . . . until he remembers that riding clouds can be a very dangerous (and expensive) business. Read on:

“Since we announced the names of the winners, many recipients have contacted me and requested a way to display their achievement; therefore, I put our artists and designers to work. We were able to create our most exquisite and distinguished wall plaque ever. This year, we are offering this limited edition wall plaque commemorating your achievement as an Editor's Choice Award recipient. Each certificate is numbered, signed, and mounted on a solid maple plaque. This beautiful display piece truly honors your accomplishment!”

“As an Editor's Choice Award winner, we're sure you'll want to improve your craft and further your involvement in poetry. There's no better way to do that than by joining the International Society of Poets (ISP), the largest poetry organization in the world. As a member of the ISP, you'll receive a quarterly magazine filled with articles, contests, and lots of poetry. In addition, you will be part of an organization that promotes PEACE—Poetry, Education, Accomplishment, Charity, and Equality. Please join the thousands of members who have submitted poetry, including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, and the late "Man in Black, Johnny Cash.”

And just how much will it cost me to walk in the shoes of the Man in Black. Uh-huh. I can have both the plaque and membership in the ISP for a mere $75.00 (plus $14.00 for shipping and handling). But, before I hand over the cash, maybe I should take a closer look at the International Society of Poets.

Their website, poetry.com, is actually a very large site with a very large (they claim 6 million entries) database of poets and poetry. Now, let’s see, Johnny Cash. Yes, there he is and he has several poems under his name. Would you like to read one? First, I’d better take care of the legal stuff. Don’t want to get my ass sued for copyright infringement. This poem is reprinted here under the “fair use” provisions of Canada’s copyright legislation, which allows copyright material to be reprinted for educational purposes and critical review.

Tourmented
By Johnny Cash

this was inpired by somebody
that i hope one day would become my wife.
She tought me that the secrets of life
were defined by the jagged edge of a
knife cutting my arm in the middle
of a slaughty night.
as the blood spills it's a thick blue water
that leave quite a soul that was fright.
It's freedom night flying high just like
some dirty old dust going out of sight.
we all love to make a killing upgrading
our own earning because life is all
about learning where nobody could do
for us the teaching i guess it's
the carrying that make us waiting
for the wisdom of an higher calling.

Are they kidding me? OK, so Cash went through some very rough times back in the sixties, with the booze and the drugs. But, was there really a time in his life when he got that strung out. I didn’t even bother to look for Bill Clinton's submissions.

To be continued . . .

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Who in the hell is GEMA?

I had intended to fire another shot across the bow of the Music Publishers Association of America. You know, the turkey’s threatening legal action against OLGA, the On Line Guitar Archives. But, in browsing the net, researching stories, I came across an article from Germany that I found both interesting and scary.

A collection rights society is responsible for collecting fees for the performance and mechanical reproduction of musical or other copyrighted works. The MPA, for example, represents the copyright holders who publish sheet music and tab, and see to it that everyone pays for the privilege of publishing copyrighted works in any format, whether for profit or pleasure.

A collection “rights” outfit in Germany is currently negotiating a deal with manufacturers of PC’s whereby they will pay a “levy” to that society, GEMA, on the sale of all new computers sold in that country.

Their justification is that PC’s allow users to make private copies of text, audio and video data distributed over the internet. Since private copying can’t be stopped, they want levies to be paid on new computers in the same way as it is now paid on CD’s, DVD’s, audio cassettes, etc. The money collected, theoretically, will be distributed to the creators of the copyrighted works.

And, before I go much further, I should point out that the collection of a levy is a done deal; the sticking point is how much the levy will be. The organization representing the manufacturers of the PC’s has suggested 15 Euros ($20.00 Cdn) per unit. GEMA is asking for over 36 Euros per unit ($50.00 Cdn).

But, even the most cursory investigation reveals some very serious concerns with this idea. Among the major flaws is a presumption of guilt. GEMA is assuming that every computer purchased will be used to make illegal copies of music, movies and computer applications. This is not the case. And people who download, store or distribute perfectly legal material via the internet should not be required to pay extortion money to anyone for the right to do so.

For example, one of my favourite sites is Project Gutenberg. There you can download free copies of some of the classics of literature; Robert Louis Stevenson, Sir Walter Scott, Victor Hugo, James Fenimore Cooper, Edgar Rice Burroughs, etc, etc. And, there are probably thousands of free computer applications being distributed freely and legally under various licenses across the internet. Should users be required to pay a fee for downloading and copying this legal material?

No one should be fooled by the suggestion that it is the manufacturer who is paying the levy, not the consumer. That’s a no brainer. The additional cost will be passed on to the consumer, whether or not they use their PC for an illegal purpose.

Then there’s the fact that there is already a levy on the blank media, the CD’s, DVD’s, etc. That’s already true in Canada, as well as in Germany. And, in Germany there is an additional levy on the device used to create the media, CD and DVD burners, for example. Adding a levy on top of that is going a little overboard.

And, if the levy itself isn’t going overboard, then the demand by GEMA that the levy should be retroactive to 2002 certainly has to be considered overkill. Estimates are that between 2002 through 2005, there were 13 million computers sold in Germany. The estimated cost of a retroactive levy is 350 million Euros; that’s roughly half a billion dollars Canadian.

Canada’s copyright legislation is being discussed in Parliament as I write this post. Given some of the things happening in the world of copyright restriction, enforcers such as the RIAA, the MMPA, the MPA, and GEMA in Germany, Canadians should be paying a whole lot more attention to what’s happening. There’s a lot more than a few bucks involved.

It’s a matter of personal freedom. Think about it for a minute. Every time you buy a blank CD to record a video of little Bobby’s birthday party, you’re paying a levy to some group you’ve likely never heard of, simply because that blank CD could be used to illegally copy restricted material.

Most people pay little attention to copyright laws, because they don’t think their personal freedoms are jeopardized by copyright restrictions; they’re wrong. And, given the material I’ve collected while researching this topic, I’ll probably be ranting about this bloody madness in future posts.

Monday, November 5, 2007

Weird & wacky county songs (Part 2)

Country music has been around for a long time. Most people give Jimmie Rodgers and the Carter Family credit for the creation of the genre back in 1926 -1927

Both those talents recorded old ballads, often with a new twist, before they got around to writing their own songs. However, neither of these icons can be blamed for the song titles populating the music scene since their demise.

Critics pan country for using the same tired cliches; writing songs about getting drunk, getting laid and going to jail. Admittedly, there are some themes used more or less consistently in country music. Country love songs, for example, seem to follow one of several formulae:

  • Boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets drunk and cries in his beer
  • Boy meets girl, boy marries girl, boy gets drunk and cries in his beer
  • Boy meets girl, girl loses boy to another girl, girl gets drunk and cries in her beer
  • Boy meets girl, girl loses boy to another man, girl gets drunk and cries in her beer (Sorry folks, it’s true. Some guy wrote a song called, “I Fell For Her, She Fell For Him, He Fell For Me
  • Boy meets girl, boy catches girl cheating and shoots her winding up in jail before he can get drunk and cry in his beer

But not all country songs are love songs. For every song about some guy falling for a pretty girl, there’s one about some guy getting saddled with an ugly one. It’s just that songs about ugly women rarely reach the top of the country charts.

    How many people have a copy of Ronnie Prophet’s Greatest Hits album, with Ronnie doing, “I Should Have Used A Brown Paper Sack”? Come on people. Give me a break. I can’t be the only one who bought that album. But, as bad as it was, Ronnie didn’t get as vicious as the guy who wrote, “I Wouldn’t Take Her To A Dog Fight (I’m Afraid She’d Win)” or that other classic put-down, “You're The Reason Our Kids Are So Ugly”.

    And, I’ve got very little time for guys who want to cry in their beer even when they get the girl. Mickey Gilley started it off with a song called, “Don’t All The Girls Look Prettier At Closing Time.” Wiilie Nelson piped in a few years later with a song called, “I Went To Bed At 2 With A 10 (And Woke Up This Morning At 10 With A 2)”.

    I have absolutely no pity for those guys. Everybody knows drinking and chasing women go hand in hand. But guys, if you got that drunk, you got what you deserved. And if you found the situation so distasteful, maybe you should have gone home alone and hummed a few bars of, “At the Gas Station of Love, I Got the Self Service Pump”. Ok, that’s not country, it’s a weird Al Yankovic song, but it fits well. From a personal point of view, when “She Looks Good Thru The Bottom Of My Shot Glass”, it’s time to call it a night.

    And, I guess it should be pointed out that it’s not only guys who wake up in the morning disappointed. How about Deana Carter when she begs the question, “Is This Why I Shaved My Legs?” She doesn’t sound a bit like a happy camper to me.

    And, I guess I should offer a word of advice to the girl who sang, “All The Guys Who Turn Me On, Turn Me Down”. Try getting to the bar a little later in the evening, preferably near closing time. And remember, all the girls look prettier through the bottom of a shot glass, so buy him a few drinks. He’ll love you for it and that’s what you’re after, after all. Or, you could follow the advice of Georgia White, an old blues artist who used to do a song called, "If I Can't Sell It I'll Keep Sittin' On It (Before I Give It Away). Yes, the song was about peddling ass.

    Another staple of the country genre is songs about the womanizer who runs off with your woman sending you to the nearest bar to cry in your beer. Songs like, “He’s Got A Way With Women And He Just Got Away With Mine.” Or that other old country standard, “It Took A Helluva Man To Take My Anne, But It Sure Didn't Take Him Long “ or the one by Jim Eberhart that says, “My Wife Ran Off With My Best Friend (And I Sure Do Miss Him)“

    And, country singers always have a word or two to say about nagging wives; songs like, “It's Hard to Kiss the Lips at Night (That Chew Your Ass Out All Day Long)

    Wow. Reading all these great song titles has suddenly filled me with inspiration. I think I’ll grab my guitar and write myself a country song. I’ve already got the title. I’ll call it, “I’m Gonna Put A Bar In The Back Of My Car And Drive Myself To Drink.” No, maybe not. I think that one’s already been done.

    But I will return to this topic at another time.

    Saturday, November 3, 2007

    The Torching of Todd's Outhouse


    It’s Gone, Boys. It’s Gone
    By Matt Todd

    The night was cold,
    The moon was full,
    Snow lay on the ground
    Some drunken bum came stumbling home
    And burned our shithouse down.
    We didn’t mind
    His going in
    We never locked the door
    But he never put out his cigarette
    He just dropped it on the floor

    Chorus:
    It’s gone, boys, it’s gone
    The news is going round
    Some tobacco smoking, drunken fiend
    Has burned Todd’s shithouse down.

    I’ll bet I know
    Who did the deed
    My brother Tom did shout
    ‘Twas that drunken weasel down the road
    Let’s burn the bastard out
    But Da said no,
    Here’s what we’ll do
    While the snow’s still on the ground
    Dump the porcelain pot at Willie’s
    ‘Cause our shithouse has burned down
    Repeat Chorus:

    When the frost unfroze
    We built a hut,
    Dug a new hole in the ground
    Still cussin’ that miserable son-of-a-bitch
    Who burned our shithouse down
    Repeat Chorus: